Comments by firstgradersaresmarterthanyou

  • Older Comments
  • Page 1 of 1
  • Newer Comments
Written on UT Holds Meetings to Address Custodians' Accusations, But They Don't Seem to Calm Nerves:

in response to dialecticsines:

So, you are assuredly not a custodial worker since you are posting during the middle of second shift on a weekday. The proof is in the pudding, you're a hack, and you are not one of the working people that do the brunt of the work at these institutions. For all your talk of intellectual posturing, it is certainly telling that you have chosen your name to reflect your closest of mental kin, a first grader. It is clear that you are familiar with the mindset.

Either way, custodial work at the university doesn't work like a factory line, and nobody "picks up the slack." They are assigned to clean certain areas, and people assigned to other areas don't come back to sweep up after them. Clearly, it is you who hasn't spent much time with the custodial staff. Or maybe you are! Perhaps you should tell your boss that you are posting on the internet during your shift!

Glad I got you to crack open a dictionary though, there a lot of useful information in there. See you in hell, or socialism.

I am sorry. Your position would be?? Union? Journalist wanna be?...which one?? One without much promise.

Your debating skills are lacking, but fun to watch you kick and scream with agony of defeat.

And, yes, I enjoy using the 'firstgrader..' name, because if I had chosen something, let's say, a 2nd grader, your ability to comprehend would be compromised, since your lack of any education would render you helpless.

Custodial work does not have slack..it has undone. So, you are from the mindset its okay to leave things undone. Which is another trait of the lazy and intentional dependent worker.

Once again you have skirted, ignored, feared, and even ran from the facts. Insults are your plan of action-people will be forced to look at them, so they miss the actual truths being spoken.

Until another day.

Written on UT Holds Meetings to Address Custodians' Accusations, But They Don't Seem to Calm Nerves:

in response to dialecticsines:

"Where is the journalism for the workers that are happy?"

There are no happy workers. The only happy workers on the planet are those that have ownership and control over their workplace.

"Where are the remarks made by some that expressed outrage at the union people being intimidating when asking why aren't they are going to the meetings?"

There are none. Meetings are voluntary in the union and no pressure is placed on worker to sacrifice their time or livelihoods to participate in the organization. The workers join the union and pay dues in good faith that the dedicated staff and volunteers will work to support them. Members who want to attend meetings can and are encouraged to, members who don't want to don't have to, simple as that.

"How about the remarks that expressed outrage at the complaining employees attempting to speak on the happy workers' behalf?"

There are none, except from doughy middle men like yourself who have the luxury of complaining on the internet at noon, instead of doing labor. These workers have not been afforded the luxury of being a whiny child like yourself.

"Where are the answers for workers who are always late, and calling in sick on a regular basis, and we have to cover their work?"

Don't pretend like you are a "we" here. You do not work in the same line of work as these people, lest you wouldn't be complaining on here, and would instead be licking your bosses boots for an extra penny a week.

"These are not my fellow workers, because they don't want to work. They want it like it was, so no one watches over them. There are more happy employees than unhappy ones. Just because you have to work, doesn't mean you're being disrespected."

Indeed, they are not your fellow workers because you are not a member of the working class, considering the luxuries that have been detailed, such as your luxury to complain on the internet during working hours. If you worked in this position, you would probably be asleep at noon since these are second shift workers. Instead, considering that this is your first post on this website, and that you joined today, May 16, in all likelihood you are a paid hack, by UTK, Knox County GOP, or some other anti-worker entity.

Godspeed to the workers, and may they struggle hard and fast to annihilate the power and ideology of persons like yourself.

To answer my dear union rep.
"The only happy workers..."
This sounds eerily similar to socialism:
A political and economic theory of that advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated...
(in Marxist theory) A transitional social state between the overthrow of capitalism and the realization of communism.
For sure Narcissism.
Back to the rebuttal...
How about taking ownership and doing the job assigned, so my fellow workers and I don't have to pick up the slack. Your disposition is classic answer, and you don't know EVERYONE's feelings, especially ours.
""Where are the remarks made by some that expressed outrage at the union people being intimidating..."
"There are none. Meetings..."
Okay...
Please answer why your 'reps' come to me, while I am working no less, and attempt to put words in my mouth, so they can take and give misinformation to the media.
"How about the remarks that expressed outrage at the complaining employees attempting to speak on the happy workers' behalf?"
"There are none, except from doughy middle men like yourself who have the luxury of complaining on the internet at noon, instead of doing labor. These workers have not been afforded the luxury of being a whiny child like yourself."
Psst...
I have a video and audio of the meeting, too.
On the other items, you're contentious remarks prove your inability to debate logically and without insult. Therefore, lending all to believe your defensive posture is to shield your lack of intellectual power.
"Where are the answers for workers who are always late, and calling in sick on a regular basis, and we have to cover their work?"
"Don't pretend like you are a "we" here. You do not work in the same line of work as these people, lest you wouldn't be complaining on here, and would instead be licking your bosses boots for an extra penny a week."
Deflect attention from the facts. Just like the intent of the meetings. Please refer back to my last rebuttal (.."insults..").
I am a 'we', and WE are happy. :)
""These are not my fellow workers, because they don't want to work…””
“Indeed, they are not your fellow workers because you are not a member of the working class…”
Wow! My response will be the same as my last.
"Godspeed to the workers, and may they struggle hard and fast to annihilate the power and ideology of persons like yourself."
You're beginning to scare me now...
I repeat...SOCIALISM
"A political and economic theory of that advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated...
(in Marxist theory) A transitional social state between the overthrow of capitalism and the realization of communism."
Perhaps you need to spend more time with us workers...just saying.
Thank you for the banter.

Written on UT Holds Meetings to Address Custodians' Accusations, But They Don't Seem to Calm Nerves:

Unfortunately, you cannot cure laziness. Where is the journalism for the workers that are happy? Where are the remarks made by some that expressed outrage at the union people being intimidating when asking why aren't they are going to the meetings? How about the remarks that expressed outrage at the complaining employees attempting to speak on the happy workers' behalf? Where are the answers for workers who are always late, and calling in sick on a regular basis, and we have to cover their work? These are the same ones who were being loud and proud in the meeting. These are not my fellow workers, because they don't want to work. They want it like it was, so no one watches over them. There are more happy employees than unhappy ones. Just because you have to work, doesn't mean you're being disrespected.

It makes for good headlines though.

  • Older Comments
  • Page 1 of 1
  • Newer Comments