Web Search powered by Yahoo! SEARCH
Thanks for the great article! I do wish that the name of the "prominent local charity, notorious for its treatment of LGBT clients in need" had been given. Why protect any charity that turns away those who need its help, for whatever reason? Why does this particular charity deserve such journalistic favors? It might have been helpful to talk about how most homophobia is, in fact, church sponsored, as apparently this unidentified charity is. Is that too hot a button for MP's editorial staff?