Whose Money? You Pay Taxes to Educate Everybody's Kids

It sounds like education reform, and on the surface it has a certain kind of logic.

The General Assembly will be taking up a voucher plan this session that would give parents tax money to spend on a private school if they are unhappy with the school their child attends. I don’t know the details of the plan; Gov. Bill Haslam will announce them at some point.

The idea is to provide competition for failing public schools and it usually focuses on schools in poor neighborhoods.

The way voucher plans normally work is that money normally spent on educating children is relayed to parents so they can spend it elsewhere at a private school. Using that specious logic, the money for education belongs to the parents. But it doesn’t.

If you follow the logic to its conclusion, then only the parents of children in school should pay taxes to support public schools. If you don’t have children in school, why should you pay to support them? If don’t have children, or your children have graduated, why should you be paying for someone else’s child to get an education?

We, as a society, have decided that it is a good thing to have an educated populace. We all pay taxes to support schools and we require parents to see that their child is educated either in a public school or through some private arrangement. We believe that we all benefit by having a democracy made up of educated citizens and an economy that benefits from having educated workers.

Even if the money for the vouchers comes from the state rather than local coffers it is still money that is being diverted from public education to private schools.

We use tax money to provide public schools. To decide that a public school is not getting the job done—and we need to pay for students to go elsewhere—is to admit defeat. To decide the school can’t be saved, we are just going to put lifeboats in the parking lot.

Are we looking at starting new private schools to take advantage of all this voucher money? Or are we going to bus urban kids to suburban private schools?

Should a voucher program be approved, what is likely to happen? Is the problem with low test scores that we aren’t providing good schools? Or is the problem that students lack the support at home to be successful? Is the problem truancy? Single parents working long hours and the child unsupervised?

Is it logical that children from these families are going to be transported and placed in a private school with the help of a voucher? Or is it more likely that the good students from an urban school, that have the advantage of a strong family, will move to the private school leaving only the poor (in more ways than one) students in the public school?

Who will operate these private schools and how will they make money? Given the economies of scale in operating a school system, how can you truly determine the amount of the voucher?

Private schools in states with high property taxes, teacher unions, generous pension plans, and high per-pupil expenditures can be successful. You offer a private school with fewer benefits, streamlined staff, and lower expenses and you can make a profit on the “per pupil expenditure” number. In Tennessee’s urban schools, the margin isn’t quite so generous.

You may recall a famous Knoxvillian by the name of Chris Whittle who left his Main Street campus and his failed media company to go out and enter the private-schools business. Do you think you will see any of Whittle’s schools operating in Knoxville? Or will he be in places like Philadelphia?

Education reform? Yes. Vouchers? No.

© 2013 MetroPulse. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Comments » 1

jcg writes:

Thanks for reminding us of Whittle's Edison Schools fiasco. Privatization of public education money is a recipe for corruption that benefits only elite multimillionaires and the politicians they own. Vouchers and the edu-reform business in NOT about OUR children.

Edison has drained taxpayer money in FL and NY with no accountability and a failed education model. Parents in NYC tracked its web of taxpayer bailouts by tracing Edison's Chris Cerf, CEO in FL who bankrupted Edison. Jeb Bush as governor pulled a Jimmy Hoffa move by stealing, I mean "borrowing" from the state retirement funds to bail out Edison. Hmmm, using public money to bailout corporate fraud and mismanagement? Sounds strikingly familiar...

http://nycpublicschoolparents.blogspo...

"A little background: Cerf was originally employed by Edison Schools, a for-profit charter management chain, between May 1997 until April 2005, rising to be the President and COO of the company. Though in many cases they used pressure tactics to charge districts more than average per pupil funding for their services, Edison utterly failed to make a profit or to create effective schools.
The company was eventually saved from bankruptcy when it was taken private in 2003, in a buyout by a private company called Liberty Partners, a deal facilitated by Jeb Bush, who as Governor of Florida, invested billions of the state teacher’s pension fund in the company at the same time."

Read the entire post on Cerf and prepare for similar schemes to be cooked up in TN with our money: no transparency and no accountability for the little people.

Share your thoughts

Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.

Comments can be shared on Facebook and Yahoo!. Add both options by connecting your profiles.