State Lawmakers Chase Agenda 21 While Real Problems Get Worse

A joint resolution passed this month by the State House condemning a 20-year-old United Nations document should be placed into a time capsule so future generations can understand why they inherited an unsustainable and deteriorating world. The legislators who sponsored HJR0587 embarrass not just Tennessee but also humanity.

The bill calls U.N. Agenda 21 “destructive and insidious” and says it “views the American way of life of private property ownership, single-family homes, private car ownership, individual travel choices and privately owned farms all as destructive to the environment” and will accomplish its goals “by socialist/communist redistribution of wealth... National sovereignty is deemed a social injustice.”

In fact, the document is a call for industrialized countries to establish investment and trade partnerships with developing countries to encourage sustainable development, open new markets, and sell our goods know-how to the rest of the world. Reading like a Reagan-era statement on international policy—essentially what it is—Agenda 21 calls for reduction and elimination of tariffs.

It says nations have a “sovereign right to exploit their own resources pursuant to their own environmental and developmental policies,” and promotes market policies such as “social and environmental costs in resource pricing.” Agenda 21 says countries should “Remove the barriers to progress caused by bureaucratic inefficiencies, administrative strains, unnecessary controls and the neglect of market conditions” and “Encourage the private sector and foster entrepreneurship.”

There is a whole chapter on strengthening the role of farmers in the international economy. In short, the description of Agenda 21 in the House resolution is fictional.

Single-family homes and privately owned cars are not mentioned, though transportation and “patterns of human settlement” are key topics. The most direct attack on suburban living is a recommendation for “reducing subsidies on, and recovering the full costs of, environmental and other services [such as] water supply, sanitation, waste collection, roads and telecommunications provided to higher income neighbourhoods.”

The suburbs are not called “destructive to the environment” but are criticized for setting up resource conflicts within society. Atlanta is a fine example. Georgia’s persistent efforts to take Tennessee’s water ought to have attuned state legislators to the problems that resource conflicts can cause.

Agenda 21 suggests easing conflicts with energy-efficient technologies and by eliminating price distortions like the subsidies listed above, market-based solutions that depend on private ownership to be effective.

In all likelihood, few, if any, of the 55 representatives who sponsored the resolution have actually looked at the Agenda 21 document. If they had, they never would have signed their name to such inanity. How seriously do they take their responsibility as our representatives? This resolution is a 20-year distillation of low-watt AM brainpower.

It is impossible to deny that current resource use is unsustainable. Drinking water is becoming scarce even in developed countries. Fisheries are dangerously depleted, and farming requires ever more input of fertilizer and chemicals. Even with domestic oil production on the rise, prices keep climbing. Pollutants as innocuous as carbon dioxide are causing major problems that politicians are unwilling to address.

HJR0587 and the names of the culprits who supported it should go in the time capsule with news reports of the deadly tornadoes and heat records being shattered while these clowns put their selfish and delusional ideology on display.

In 2050, the few short-lived mining jobs from blowing up remaining coal-bearing ridges will be distant memories, but the sacrificed ridges will be fresh scars still bleeding toxins into creeks and rivers. Rising seas will be battering the world’s port cities, and during a respite from violent storms, the grandchildren of today’s legislators can open the time capsule and experience the shame our elected officials do not feel.

© 2012 MetroPulse. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Comments » 6

tannin writes:

Leaping lizards Rikki, why do you hate mankind so much?

leapster writes:

Humans are scratching the earth and should be concentrated in stacked housing camps along mass transit systems between dense urban centers. It would make it a lot easier to pass out the government assistance checks and the rationed health care.

Rikki writes:

Agenda 21 is right here: http://www.un.org/esa/dsd/agenda21/

You can see for yourself what it says. Granted, the real thing is not nearly as entertaining as what paranoid right-wingers have made it into. It's kind of like the telephone game. You start with "The sky is blue," and by the time it gets around to Jack_Fail, it's "The spider in my basement blew up South Dakota."

tannin writes:

If Rikki supports it, I see a big red flag.

Rikki writes:

Thanks for the freedomadvocates link, Jack, I highly recommend it to anyone who wants to see how loosely these anti-Agenda 21 rants are linked to reality. Even in formal papers, the chain of prejudices, presumptions and paranoia is held together by a thin selection of weak facts. Be sure to read the footnotes; they are more like punch lines than actual references.

ejj writes:

I have never seen such an outrageous misrepresentation of what Agenda 21 is than the statement that was passed by the State House! In fact, there is nothing in it at all that is a truthful depiction of the document or its intentions.

Thank you, Ms Hall for being a brave voice of reason in the darkness! I've studied Agenda 21, and it is exactly as you point out - a reasonable and thoughtful set of suggestions as to how mankind might go about saving itself from its deepening environmental and social crisis.

Share your thoughts

Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.

Comments can be shared on Facebook and Yahoo!. Add both options by connecting your profiles.