A Creation Syllabus for Biology Class

Good morning students, welcome to your biology class for this year. Thanks to the efforts of the Tennessee Legislature, we will be expanding our lessons this year, no longer bogged down in years of formal scientific study, but now being allowed to consider alternative creation theories. No longer are we shackled by the “theory” of evolution.

Let free scientific inquiry begin!

I will now run down the syllabus for the year, to give you an idea of what is to come.

FIRST SIX WEEKS: One theory about the creation of the Earth is the Hindu one. The world is an ocean and Lord Vishnu is a big snake. He has a lotus flower in his stomach and from that Lord Brahma appears. Lord Brahma gets lonely so he splits in two, creating a male and a female. He creates all living things. Then he goes to sleep and Lord Vishnu, the destroyer, destroys everything and Brahma has to start over. Since the world has been created and destroyed many times you need to be good, so that in the next incarnation you will be something nice, instead of a cockroach.

SECOND SIX WEEKS: The Greeks are the foundation of Western Civilization, so their creation story is something we need to pay particular attention to. Out of the void Gaea (Earth) appears. Gaea gave birth to the planets, like Uranus, who became her husband. He was a bad father and Gaea conspired with her son Cronus to castrate him with a flint sickle. (Don’t ask me what castrate means, I’m not allowed to tell you.) Cronus marries his sister Rhea and takes over but has a bad habit of eating his children to prevent a successor. Rhea finally hides one of the children, named Zeus. He grew up and gave Cronus a drink that made him vomit. The rest of the children were thus returned. They thought Zeus was a great guy for doing all that, so they made him the head god and they all ruled from Mount Olympus.

THIRD SIX WEEKS: In the Norse tradition you have Ymir, a frost ogre. He grew a man and woman under his arm. (No, I’m not allowed to explain where babies come from.) A cow licked the ice and thawed the man and woman out. They had three sons, the oldest of whom was Odin. He and his brothers killed Ymir and made the Earth. Ymir’s blood became the ocean, his body the earth, and his skull made the sky. His eyebrows became a fortress. Odin made a man and a woman out of a couple of trees. Odin himself had sex with the earth and produced a son named Thor. (Don’t ask.)

FOURTH SIX WEEKS: In the Navajo tradition, First Man and First woman go through a succession of worlds, but arrive at the fourth world and create the sun, moon, stars, and the seasons. From them comes the human race, emerging from the Hero Twins. The Hero Twins have a series of adventures. They kill monsters and protect the people. Death and evil come to the people from the Coyote.

FIFTH SIX WEEKS: We’re still working on the Wiccan bloc, the main problem being how to explain about the Goddess and the two women at creation without getting into trouble with state Sen. Stacey Campfield.

SIXTH SIX WEEKS: We will study Genesis. Yahweh, the all-powerful God, created the universe over a seven-day period and created a man named Adam. Adam was lonely so God took one of his ribs while he was sleeping and created a woman called Eve. They lived in the Garden of Eden until they were seduced into disobedience by a serpent. They were driven from the Garden of Eden, and through toil and trouble established the human race.

Unfortunately, children, it will be the end of the school year before we get through, so we won’t have time to study the biology you will need to pass the TCAP tests or get a good ACT score. But it’s a small price to pay for you to be able to study creative alternatives to evolution.

© 2012 MetroPulse. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Comments » 3

kingneb writes:

George Ellis is a Distinguished Professor of Complex Systems in the Department of Mathematics and Applied Mathematics at the University of Cape Town in South Africa. He co-authored The Large Scale Structure of Space-Time with University of Cambridge physicist Stephen Hawking, published in 1973, and is considered one of the world's leading theorists in cosmology. And he said the following in his paper "Cosmology and Verifiability":

"A modern cosmologist who was also a theologian with strict fundamentalist views could construct a universe model which began 6000 years ago in time and whose edge was at a distance of 6000 light years from the solar system. A benevolent God could easily arrange the creation of the universe ... so that suitable radiation was travelling toward us from the edge of the universe to give the illusion of a vastly older and larger expanding universe. It would be impossible for any other scientist on the Earth to refute this world picture experimentally or observationally; all that he could do would be to disagree with the author's cosmological premises." [p. 246]

Why does Ellis say this? He explains:

"we are unable to obtain a model of the universe without some specifically cosmological assumptions which are completely unverifiable. Because we wish to talk about regions we cannot directly influence or experiment on, our theory is at the mercy of the assumptions we make." [p. 246]

Yes. Evolution is still a "theory" and a sorry one at that.

thoreau writes:

in response to kingneb:

George Ellis is a Distinguished Professor of Complex Systems in the Department of Mathematics and Applied Mathematics at the University of Cape Town in South Africa. He co-authored The Large Scale Structure of Space-Time with University of Cambridge physicist Stephen Hawking, published in 1973, and is considered one of the world's leading theorists in cosmology. And he said the following in his paper "Cosmology and Verifiability":

"A modern cosmologist who was also a theologian with strict fundamentalist views could construct a universe model which began 6000 years ago in time and whose edge was at a distance of 6000 light years from the solar system. A benevolent God could easily arrange the creation of the universe ... so that suitable radiation was travelling toward us from the edge of the universe to give the illusion of a vastly older and larger expanding universe. It would be impossible for any other scientist on the Earth to refute this world picture experimentally or observationally; all that he could do would be to disagree with the author's cosmological premises." [p. 246]

Why does Ellis say this? He explains:

"we are unable to obtain a model of the universe without some specifically cosmological assumptions which are completely unverifiable. Because we wish to talk about regions we cannot directly influence or experiment on, our theory is at the mercy of the assumptions we make." [p. 246]

Yes. Evolution is still a "theory" and a sorry one at that.

Well, that settles it!
Anybody knows a Professor of Mathematics can demolish (just by thinking! really hard!) 150 years of BIOLOGICAL (and geological) science, evidence, digging, etc., tested by debate among tens of thousands of independent scientists. I guess we can shut down all the world's universities except his! {;-)>

thoreau writes:

And reality-based Science can be SO discouraging -- and hard! and require real-
No, those religious myths about Creation can really give us hope (depending on what you think about snakes!).

Share your thoughts

Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.

Comments can be shared on Facebook and Yahoo!. Add both options by connecting your profiles.