The Stop Online Piracy Act is the Law That America Desperately Needs. Right?

The long nights of winter are fully upon us, and without that sense of togetherness that only the holidays can provide, this can only mean one thing: Those popular protest movements that have been all the rage this year? They’re boned. Have you been outside lately? It’s cold out there.

Luckily, the first world freedom fighters have acquired their next target. Say hello to H.R. 3261, also known as the Stop Online Piracy Act, a one-two punch of government intrusion and corporate oligarchy that detractors can decry as the harbinger of the end of the World Wide Web from the convenience of their parents’ basements. (Let’s face it—it’s much easier to occupy reddit than Wall Street anyway.)

SOPA is largely a bill of obligations, one that on its surface appears meant to hamstring potential foreign copyright infringers by depriving them of American access and assets. SOPA seats its powers primarily in two categories. The U.S. Attorney General’s office is empowered under SOPA to serve court orders demanding that ISPs, search engines, and others stop hosting, linking to, and carrying out transactions to and from infringing sites. Further, copyright holders themselves can allege to financial institutions and advertisers that a site infringes their rights, whereupon said companies are legally obligated under SOPA to cease all activities with the alleged (not convicted or even investigated, mind you) infringer.

SOPA is currently in legislative limbo, having seen extended debate in the House Judiciary Committee but not yet having been put to a committee vote. The committee will in all likelihood take the matter up again early next year, giving opposition groups time to get their message out, but strong support within the committee indicates that SOPA will probably see action in the House proper soon.

But think about it for a minute. That’s a lot of extra work to be done, and America’s IT infrastructure is a pretty bare-bones affair from a human-resources standpoint. Do you honestly think that it could handle the increased workload that an initial SOPA-level rollout would require, let alone the constant increase in manpower required to maintain SOPA standards in perpetuity?

Absolutely not, and that means jobs, ones with all-American companies like Amazon (the Web end of Amazon, not the sweatshop end that’s setting up shop in Tennessee) and GoDaddy (if they manage to survive their ongoing losses of tens of thousands of clients over their support of SOPA), not to mention the increases in governmental activity needed to police the Web for SOPA compliance. A legislated mandate that greatly increases the demand for public- and private-sector employment? Surely this is the New Deal all over again.

And these are good jobs, too. Unlike the industry lobbyists who wrote SOPA, these newly employed network engineers and system admins will be fresh-faced college kids, too young and too grateful to be employed to have developed the kinds of ulterior motives it takes to, for instance, write a bill like SOPA. And unlike the legislators who have been so obviously schooled in how SOPA should work by those aforementioned lobbyists, these kids will actually have to be technologically competent enough to keep their VCRs from flashing “12:00” all the time.

Ta-da! Instant demand for a skilled work force, and all it costs is a little due process and a willingness to ignore the fact that venture capital for Internet investment would dry up in a SOPA-created climate.

And so what if SOPA ignores due process? These are foreign sites we’re talking about, and as we all know, foreigners simply aren’t entitled to the same rights that Americans enjoy. A Russian site that hosts a BitTorrent file that allows users to download a virus-ridden episode of Mad Men commits no less than an act of economic war, especially since episodes of Mad Men are basically all we export anymore. And it’s not like copious precedents exist in which legislation intended to secure a nation from foreign belligerents has been turned against the citizens of the nation itself, so what’s there to worry about?

When it comes down to it, SOPA, as in all things anti-piratical, is not meant to be efficient, or even functional. We get gunships, they get Johnny Depp. We get bigger gunships, they get a kraken. We kill their Johnny Depp and steal their kraken, they get Orlando Bloom and wreck our gunships. It keeps on going forever and it never gets any less ridiculous, but unless good, law-abiding citizens allow their leaders to throw too many resources into too many ill-defined projects designed to achieve too many ill-advised goals manipulated by too many ill-willed interests... well, I don’t know what will happen, because it never has. Probably socialism.

© 2012 MetroPulse. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Comments » 2

Maynard writes:

The pirates get 10 cents per click on ads dispayed on a page linking to my music catalog in the form of torrents and rar files downloadable free. And that doesn't even consider the per month fee charged by rapidshare and others to give my music away faster. And this is all easily found on google. The pirates are looking for a fight and they got one.

Calling all musicians - Stop being ripped off...
JOIN ME IN THE FIGHT AGAINST THE PIRATES

STOP THE PIRATE NERDS NOW
TAKE BACK OUR FREEDOM TO CREATE

Don't be in league with pirate thieves
I only vote for supporters of STOP ONLINE PIRACY
We need a new internet, one that protects it's citizens from theft.

http://www.zdnet.com/blog/seo/make-mo...

macrat writes:

What about sales of used goods? The manufacturers don't make a dime on such sales, so will they be pulling that off the 'Net? No more eBay, no more used books from Amazon, no more selling your things through Craigslist. Not even your dad's antiques can be listed online, it'll have to be at the flea market. Oh, and those birthday parties you put online? The song "Happy Birthday" is copyrighted, so unless you paid them for a broadcasting of the song, say goodbye to your Youtube account. Stumped playing your favorite video game, and want to watch a "Let's Play" walkthrough or read one online? Unless it's from the official source company, forget it. SOPA will only accept SPECIFIC licenses for user-created videos of copyrighted games. They'll have to issue each and every person a license to upload videos from their games. Trying to get a popularity base by having friends and family upload videos of your own work? That will be fine, until it reaches the $1000 mark in net worth, about a quarter of a concert hall's upper mezzanine seating. Some agent or scout can yank the videos, claiming they violate your copyrights eliminating other potential agents from ever seeing it. You'll have to accept that one agent's offer as that would be your only shot. Social media fan networking of artists would have through be a single OFFICIAL system once they hit the $1K mark in value, making it difficult to spread interest. You'd have to have to sell out all the seats at your first performance, to make up for the costs of spreading fame on a solo official website. The big studios can afford to set up individual fansites, but can aspiring artists?

Share your thoughts

Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.

Comments can be shared on Facebook and Yahoo!. Add both options by connecting your profiles.