Speaking Up for Unnatural Reproduction

Fill Out the Form, or write:
602 S. Gay Street
2nd Floor
Knoxville, TN 37902

This letter/e-mail is regarding Frank Cagle’s piece “State Republicans’ Not-So-Rapturous Session.” [Frank Talk, May 26, 2011] Specifically the paragraph: “The ridiculous ‘Don’t Say Gay’ bill was changed to merely require that science curricula teach ‘natural human reproduction.’ Is there any other kind?” I am going to take this question as not rhetorical and answer with a resounding YES! I myself am a product of reproduction other than the “natural” kind. (I won’t even try to attempt defining “natural.”)

I was told at 8 years old that I was a “test-tube baby,” a child born through IVF (in-vitro fertilization). So apart from the homosexual issues raised by this bill, it now includes (or should I say excludes!) even more people. I see no reason why another child would have to wait for up to six more years to be taught about alternative procreation methods. To choose not to teach and to be banned from teaching something are two very different things. The bill is no less ridiculous than it has ever been, and it is comments like Cagle’s that show the narrow thought that is produced by education systems that do not teach about the diversity of life.

Liz Roper


© 2011 MetroPulse. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Comments » 0

Be the first to post a comment!

Share your thoughts

Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.

Comments can be shared on Facebook and Yahoo!. Add both options by connecting your profiles.