Egregious Ranting

Fill Out the Form, or write:
602 S. Gay Street
2nd Floor
Knoxville, TN 37902

You published a letter from Melissa Saunders on Jan. 27 in which she attacked Noam Chomsky for allegedly making money from books and speeches, and called him an “anarchist/socialist/whatever” with millions of dollars in a trust fund. [“The Chomsky™ Brand”]

Whether or not her facts are accurate, she has committed an egregious logical fallacy: She seeks to discredit the speech—before it was made—by a personal attack on the man.

Attendance was not affected by similarly held sentiments. I got there over an hour before the speech and barely made it in. Every seat was taken and many were turned away. Chomsky gave a thoughtful speech about the serious problems facing our nation and it was respectfully received, as befits a man of his standing in the world, and as befits the students of an institution of higher learning.

Walter Cronkite is quoted as having said that he feared our nation had lost its ability to govern itself. If we regularly mistake ranting for thoughtful and rational dialogue, I am afraid he might be prophetic.

Carol Krauss


© 2011 MetroPulse. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Related Stories

Comments » 0

Be the first to post a comment!

Share your thoughts

Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.

Comments can be shared on Facebook and Yahoo!. Add both options by connecting your profiles.