City Councilman Charlie Thomas Opts to Run

When City Councilman Charlie Thomas was appointed to fill the rest of Bob Becker’s term representing the city’s 5th District earlier this year, he said he would not make himself a candidate for re-election. But that, he says, was on the assumption that there would be an actual competitive race for the seat. There was good reason to expect so: Thomas was one of six people who put themselves forward for the short-term appointment. But June’s filing deadline came and went with just one candidate, Mark Campen, declared for the 5th District seat. That’s why, Thomas says, he decided to reverse course this week and mount a write-in campaign to hold onto his position.

Normally a write-in candidate, even an incumbent, would be at a big disadvantage. But because of the way Council races work, if Thomas manages to get at least 25 write-in votes in the Sept. 27 primary—which is open only to 5th District voters—his name will then go on the ballot for the citywide general election in November. It means Campen, who had been expecting a smooth ride to Council, will suddenly have to mount a real campaign. He has already criticized Thomas for going back on his word, which may resonate with voters. On the other hand, some 5th District residents may be happy that issues of particular interest to their North Knoxville neighborhoods will get a little more lip service than they would have otherwise. A one-man race doesn’t generate a lot of discussion.

© 2011 MetroPulse. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Comments » 1

alasandalack01 writes:

I find it exciting when a run for office brings out the Swift Boaters.

I find support for Charlie Thomas in a piece authored by Ms. Betty Bean in the Halls/Fountain City Shopper. In her article, Ms. Bean quotes Third District Council member Brenda Palmer and Council member Chris Woodhill.

From Brenda Palmer, she reported, " There were so many applicants for the interim seat, I expected that one or more would step up and run. But none of those people stepped up, and I think that releases him from any pledge he made. When there's an open seat it's always good to have competition."

From Mr. Woodhull: "I feel very comfortable with Charlie deciding to run and I don't think that violates the spirit of any promise."

Further in his remarks, Mr. Woodhull added, "If you only have one candidate it incites a kind of lethargy."

I found nothing to support Number9's contention but I did find support for a vibrant exchange of ideas.

Read Ms. Bean's Article for yourself:

Share your thoughts

Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.

Comments can be shared on Facebook and Yahoo!. Add both options by connecting your profiles.