Reply to a comment

Reply to this comment

knoxarch writes:

I'd like to note that the owner's comment about being stymied by those "historical people" is ludicrous. While it's often convenient to blame someone else for one's own problems, the added step for a building permit on a house in a historic district is one small application, containing basically the same information as is required for a building permit. This application is then heard at one hearing of the Historic Zoning Commission.

In the case of this house, their application was heard in February, 2012. The applicant did not show up at the hearing, but it was approved in its entirety anyway, with the exception of a different (cheaper) roofing material being approved.

A year later, with work having barely progressed from that point, is it reasonable to blame a process that happened a year ago, at which everything asked for was approved? A rational person, I would imagine, would say not.

Share your thoughts

Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.

Comments can be shared on Facebook and Yahoo!. Add both options by connecting your profiles.