Thanks for the great article! I do wish that the name of the "prominent local charity, notorious for its treatment of LGBT clients in need" had been given. Why protect any charity that turns away those who need its help, for whatever reason? Why does this particular charity deserve such journalistic favors? It might have been helpful to talk about how most homophobia is, in fact, church sponsored, as apparently this unidentified charity is. Is that too hot a button for MP's editorial staff?
Share your thoughts
Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.
Powell writes:
Thanks for the great article! I do wish that the name of the "prominent local charity, notorious for its treatment of LGBT clients in need" had been given. Why protect any charity that turns away those who need its help, for whatever reason? Why does this particular charity deserve such journalistic favors? It might have been helpful to talk about how most homophobia is, in fact, church sponsored, as apparently this unidentified charity is. Is that too hot a button for MP's editorial staff?
Share your thoughts
Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.