Web Search powered by Yahoo! SEARCH
You are right - Law Director is complicated. It is hard to explain to people what he does. And the press is not very curious about it either.
Maybe you should ask Jarret why he approved the Trustee's salary suits (2 years plus an amendment) with the bonuses in there for employees who hadn't earned them. JDIII needs to clean house, but Jarret needs to come clean on his "advise and counsel" to the Trustee.
He also needs to explain why he took 3 different positions on the mayor's attempt to take over the fee office budgets.
And then there was the bad advice he gave the mayor on severance payments.
Jarret may have experience on paper - but what good is that if he can't figure out that right answer?
Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.
Username * Don't have an account? Sign up for a new account
Password * Can't remember? Reset your password
Comments can be shared on
Add both options by connecting your profiles.