Web Search powered by Yahoo! SEARCH
@ 4:46, Dr_Gary_Hurd stated:
“in direct contradiction to Lee Bowman's false claims regarding astrology which Behe defended as a “science,” here is a relevant portion of that testimony”
Exactly what ‘false claims’ are you referring to? I had stated [April 6, 9:12] that Rothschild. • Led the witness
• That Behe stated that it fit the ‘definition’ of theory, but that it was ‘dated’ and ‘false’.
• And that Behe was extensively ‘quote mined’ to make it look like he accepted astrology as a ‘valid’ theory, i.e. one that is true.
This raises a question. Are you implying that Behe ‘accepts’ astrology as viable? All you did was copy and paste some testimony, w/o further comments. But your obvious implication is that yes, Behe accepts astrology as ‘valid science.’ In my next comment, let’s analyze the testimony. Emphasis mine, to highlight the essentials.
Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.
Username * Don't have an account? Sign up for a new account
Password * Can't remember? Reset your password
Comments can be shared on
Add both options by connecting your profiles.