Web Search powered by Yahoo! SEARCH
<i>This new proposal is a checks and balances review of budgets. Nothing more.</i>
That is my understanding as well, and Sullivan's. I can not speak for the easily mislead, but I had no problem understanding the writer's explanation and analysis.
If anyone is attempting to mislead people, it is you with your irrelevant reference to the defeated "King Mayor" amendment. Sullivan cited an adopted amendment and the 2006 Supreme Court decision. Your statistics are simply off topic.
Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.
Username * Don't have an account? Sign up for a new account
Password * Can't remember? Reset your password
Comments can be shared on
Add both options by connecting your profiles.