Darwin’s theory of evolution is a creation story myth you prefer to call "science," but it's more accurately called a "tautology."
Since Darwin’s evolution myth is taught in our public school system, it bears the burden of producing evidence. Since, after 150 years of trying, it has failed miserably in explaining the origin of life and confronting the evidence against it (e.g. the fossil record), it hasn't produced any scientific evidence at all. Macro evolution has never been observed in the past nor the present. In fact, the only thing that has conclusively macro evolved has been, well, the theory of evolution.
So not only is Darwin's joke of a religion passed off today as "science" to children who don't know any better, we get further ridiculous theories to try to explain why the evidence doesn't fit. "Panspermia" and "punctuated equilibrium," anyone? It used to be "our evidence didn't fossilize" until the discovery of the Cambrian and pre-Cambrian fossil beds. Uh-oh.
And no, micro evolution is not proof of a bear or blade of grass evolving into a human being. So what are we left with? A fossil record with no evidence of macro evolution; a history of fake proofs like Java Man, Nebraska Man, Peking Man, etc.; a theory that requires blind faith of its believer; no explanation for how non-living matter can suddenly come to life; a theory that contradicts the most basic laws of science like cause-and-effect; and a theory that can't even explain how nothing suddenly exploded into something!
Even the leading evolutionary "thinkers" like Lewontin and Gould admit the lack of evidence is the "trade secret of paleontology," and that "species does not arise gradually by the gradual transformation of its ancestors; it appears all at once and fully formed."
I fully support your right to believe in the religion of Darwinism, secular humanism, materialism, or whatever the true believers are calling it this year, but don't call it "science" until you have evidence to back it up.
Share your thoughts
Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.
Billsikes writes:
Darwin’s theory of evolution is a creation story myth you prefer to call "science," but it's more accurately called a "tautology."
Since Darwin’s evolution myth is taught in our public school system, it bears the burden of producing evidence. Since, after 150 years of trying, it has failed miserably in explaining the origin of life and confronting the evidence against it (e.g. the fossil record), it hasn't produced any scientific evidence at all. Macro evolution has never been observed in the past nor the present. In fact, the only thing that has conclusively macro evolved has been, well, the theory of evolution.
So not only is Darwin's joke of a religion passed off today as "science" to children who don't know any better, we get further ridiculous theories to try to explain why the evidence doesn't fit. "Panspermia" and "punctuated equilibrium," anyone? It used to be "our evidence didn't fossilize" until the discovery of the Cambrian and pre-Cambrian fossil beds. Uh-oh.
And no, micro evolution is not proof of a bear or blade of grass evolving into a human being. So what are we left with? A fossil record with no evidence of macro evolution; a history of fake proofs like Java Man, Nebraska Man, Peking Man, etc.; a theory that requires blind faith of its believer; no explanation for how non-living matter can suddenly come to life; a theory that contradicts the most basic laws of science like cause-and-effect; and a theory that can't even explain how nothing suddenly exploded into something!
Even the leading evolutionary "thinkers" like Lewontin and Gould admit the lack of evidence is the "trade secret of paleontology," and that "species does not arise gradually by the gradual transformation of its ancestors; it appears all at once and fully formed."
I fully support your right to believe in the religion of Darwinism, secular humanism, materialism, or whatever the true believers are calling it this year, but don't call it "science" until you have evidence to back it up.
Share your thoughts
Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.