So, uhm, you'd rather see federal tax dollars spent to support children who may not be wanted--by WIC funding, free lunches at schools, special education courses, or long-term residential and treatment facilities for children whose health is so precarious and time-consuming that only 24/7 care will do? Or maybe a life sentence in the local penitentiary? If the pregnant woman in her wisdom knows she cannot care for a child, who are we to override that decision?
Until the anti-choice crowd steps up with adoption papers and nine-month support for birthmothers in hand--for EVERY fetus that may be aborted--don't even make this argument. It's federal dollars spent now or later.
Share your thoughts
Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.
creech37914#204390 writes:
So, uhm, you'd rather see federal tax dollars spent to support children who may not be wanted--by WIC funding, free lunches at schools, special education courses, or long-term residential and treatment facilities for children whose health is so precarious and time-consuming that only 24/7 care will do? Or maybe a life sentence in the local penitentiary? If the pregnant woman in her wisdom knows she cannot care for a child, who are we to override that decision?
Until the anti-choice crowd steps up with adoption papers and nine-month support for birthmothers in hand--for EVERY fetus that may be aborted--don't even make this argument. It's federal dollars spent now or later.
Share your thoughts
Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.