"Kernell was initally charged with a misdemeanor. It was an appropriate charge."
As I recall, Kernell was initially charged with two redundant misdemeanors which were wrapped up in a neat little package by USDoJ into one felony charge.
That charge was later revised in a superseding indictment, possibly because the infinite loop created by the aforementioned redundancies threatened to bluescreen the prosecution's case.
I'd throw some links in here for further perusal, but MP's comments code seems to return garbage when I try.
Share your thoughts
Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.
daveprince writes:
"Kernell was initally charged with a misdemeanor. It was an appropriate charge."
As I recall, Kernell was initially charged with two redundant misdemeanors which were wrapped up in a neat little package by USDoJ into one felony charge.
That charge was later revised in a superseding indictment, possibly because the infinite loop created by the aforementioned redundancies threatened to bluescreen the prosecution's case.
I'd throw some links in here for further perusal, but MP's comments code seems to return garbage when I try.
Share your thoughts
Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.