Hall, your article is a cheap shot. Did you personally speak with any of the people you slam? Did you talk to any scientists about your premises or conclusions? Your piece reeks of cheap, emotion-based, opportunism lacking any hint of a balanced or objective approach. You are Elmer Gantry delivering a sweaty, tent-revival, sermon with TVA cast as forked-tongued Satan.
By the way, the past tense of "lead" in paragraph #2 is "led".
Share your thoughts
Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.
BayardDonahoo writes:
Hall, your article is a cheap shot. Did you personally speak with any of the people you slam? Did you talk to any scientists about your premises or conclusions? Your piece reeks of cheap, emotion-based, opportunism lacking any hint of a balanced or objective approach. You are Elmer Gantry delivering a sweaty, tent-revival, sermon with TVA cast as forked-tongued Satan.
By the way, the past tense of "lead" in paragraph #2 is "led".
Share your thoughts
Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.