movieguru (2008-04)

An Infinite Series of Tragic FrustrationsBully

Movie Guru

Julian Schnabel takes an inside look at Locked-in Syndrome in The Diving Bell and the Butterfly

by Kieron Barry

The Diving Bell and the Butterfly is a luminous film of exceptional power. Given the popularity of the memoir on which it is basedâ"Jean-Dominique Baubyâ’s 1997 account of his abrupt transformation from Parisian fashion titan to quadriplegicâ"an adaptation was perhaps only a matter of time. Fans of Baubyâ’s elegant yet visceral text, however, had good reason to dread that the purity of his miniature masterpiece would be contaminated. Iâ’m happy to confirm that Julian Schnabelâ’s searing film is every bit the equal of its source.

Better yet, rather than being slavishly respectful, the film serves as something of a companion piece to the book, taking a bold and independent route through the story and bringing its own nuances and set-pieces.

The film describes the true story of Baubyâ’s journey, by way of a massive stroke, from editor of Elle magazine to the victim of Locked-in Syndrome, exactly the kind of condition one hopes is too rare to warrant an acronym. (Indeed, reassuringly, the French doctors refer to the syndrome by its English name, granting us all a modicum of statistical hope.) Totally paralyzed save for one eyelid, Bauby uses this last, wan outpost of mobility to dictate a book, achieved, almost unbelievably, by patiently waiting until his secretary indicates the requisite letter of the alphabet and then winking at it. A momentâ’s reflection will reveal the gargantuan effort required to compose even a single sentence under such circumstances. As one might expect, the book, published just days before Baubyâ’s death, features insights of an unbearable hue in a prose distilled almost to poetry, an inevitable consequence of a form that precludes casual expression.

For much of the filmâ’s first act weâ’re forced to share the fuzzy claustrophobia of Baubyâ’s point of view. His bewildered eye roves with silent desperation along the limits of his new world. When a tear comes, it blurs the whole screen. Eventually weâ’re granted an exit from the confines of Baubyâ’s inner existence to catch a glimpse of the man himself, now a slumped, dribblesome wreck.

We lose one of the more arresting moments of the book: the atomic seconds of hell when Bauby fears doctors are about to mistakenly sew up the good eye rather than the bad. By way of compensation, however, Schnabel plucks a fine example of the patientâ’s infinite series of tragic frustrations when a nurse thoughtlessly turns off a soccer match Bauby has been silently cheering on.

The film is at its most poignant when it contrasts Baubyâ’s static life with the masculine indulgence of his happier years. All women in the film, of course, embody that delightful French paradox of delicate features allied to an aura of robust sexuality, but the extent of Baubyâ’s romantic adventures now begins and ends with his eye being impotently drawn to the heart of a nurseâ’s delicious convexity. Tellingly, the emotional chaos he had created in the lives of those around him is visited upon himself in his world of shadows. He is now powerless, at the mercy of his women, and can only watch as the opposing romantic machines he has put into motion smash into each other. His mistress refuses to see him, claiming, with faux nobility, that she wishes to remember him as he was. In stark contrast, the mother of his children uncomplainingly switches from one thankless life of service to another. In a beautiful long shot towards the end of the film our attention is drawn to her summer dress fluttering gracefully in the breeze, a simple freedom denied every character.

Lacking as I do the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciencesâ’ illogically maudlin penchants, I reject the notion of giving extra points for portrayals of disability. Like any other human condition, impediment can be acted well or acted badly. Mathieu Amalric as Bauby gives a performance of his usual brilliance in the flashback sections, but by almost any definition he is not acting in his motionless scenes; he is simply representing. For the performance to succeed it is the audience that must do the work, a transaction that inevitably yields proximity.

It is this total lack of indulgence that makes The Diving Bell and the Butterfly a quiet, aching film that will haunt you. As unflinching a study of suffering as one could imagine, the film nevertheless offers the thought that when a human is eroded to nothing but a sliver, humanity is the last thing to depart.

Rental Hygiene

Obituaries for the late Brad Renfro tend to sum up his career by mentioning The Client, which slingshot him to stardom in 1994, and Apt Pupil, wherein he shared the screen with Sir Ian McKellan and held his own. But arguably the best film in which he appearedâ"and the film that best showcases the considerable loss of talent his death entailsâ"is one of the less well-known entries on his résumé: director Larry Clarkâ’s 2001 based-on-a-true-story indie flick Bully.

Renfro stars as Marty, a slacker surfer in a Florida beach town whose best friend and worst enemy are one and the same: sociopathic rich boy Bobby (Nick Stahl). When heâ’s not playing vicious sexual games with both genders, Bobby tortures Marty, humiliating or assaulting him one minute, wooing him back with pledges of friendship the next. Sick of the abuse but unable to escape Bobbyâ’s orbit, Marty suffers until his new girlfriend (Rachel Miner) and their privileged druggie buds (including Bijou Phillips, Michael Pitt, and Kelli Garner) decide to kill their bÃte noir.

Bully isnâ’t likely most peopleâ’s idea of a shining legacy; in many ways, Clarkâ’s film is downright repellent. The director made his name as a photographer of the young and doomed and made a scandalous directing debut with 1995â’s Kids; here he rarely misses a chance to exploit his hot young actorsâ’ flesh, and their characters wallow in cruelty and stupidity as they egg each other on. But Renfroâ’s brilliant performance lifts the whole thing out of the gutter. While his Marty is no genius, thereâ’s a bottled-up quality to his body language and a wounded soulfulness in his eyes that conveys more about the character than his dialogue ever could. As the half-assed murder plot comes undone, heâ’s the only one you hope will somehow catch a break. Watching Bully makes you even more sorry that Renfro didnâ’t.

â"Lee Gardner

Columns

All content © 2008 Metropulse .